“Automated Finance, Human Consequences: Plazo Urges Caution on AI in the Markets”
“Automated Finance, Human Consequences: Plazo Urges Caution on AI in the Markets”
Blog Article
Inside the Asian Institute of Management, Joseph Plazo—founder of the algorithmic trading firm Plazo Sullivan Roche—offered an unusual message: slow down.
Inside one of Southeast Asia’s most influential business schools — What he offered instead was something rarely heard in AI circles: resistance.
“The machine may be faster. But are we still the ones deciding what matters?”
???? **He Built the Bot. But He’s Not Sure We’re Ready for It.**
He isn’t speaking from the sidelines. His firm’s AI systems have posted a 99% win rate across key timeframes and are in use by institutional clients across Europe and Asia.
And yet, his concern is clear: accuracy means little without accountability.
“Optimisation is only part of the equation,” Plazo explained. “Direction, purpose—those remain human.”
He shared a case from the early days of the pandemic. One of his firm’s bots flagged a short on gold just before the U.S. Federal Reserve issued an emergency policy shift.
“We overrode it. The algorithm was correct—but profoundly unaware.”
???? **Machines Act Fast. But Leadership Sometimes Waits.**
AI’s appeal lies in its instant execution. But at what cost?
“We must remember that a moment of hesitation can protect reputations—and futures.”
Plazo introduced a framework he calls **“Conviction Calculus”**—three questions that must be asked before executing an AI recommendation:
- Does this decision align with our values—not just our strategy?
- Have we cross-checked this with human knowledge—not just system signals?
- Will anyone say, ‘This was my call,’ or just point at the machine?
???? **The Bigger Picture: Asia’s Tech Acceleration and the Governance Gap**
Across Asia, nations are investing heavily in fintech and AI-driven innovation. From Singapore to South Korea, the push toward automation is framed as economic strategy.
But Plazo’s question cuts deeper: “Are we building intelligence without wisdom?”
He warned of systems designed to win—but not to pause.
“These weren’t errors of greed or emotion. They were perfectly logical moves—executed without context.”
???? **A New Path: Machines That Listen as Well as Compute**
Plazo is not anti-AI. He’s pro-responsibility.
His firm is developing what he calls **“narrative-integrated AI”**—models that factor in geopolitics, tone, and social context alongside market data.
“Machines that don’t just predict, but understand.”
At a private dinner after the event, multiple venture capital leaders discussed collaborations.
One investor called Plazo’s talk:
“A reminder that the tools we build still need human hands more info at the wheel.”
???? **The Collapse That Could Begin in Silence**
Plazo ended with a thought that may echo across boardrooms:
“We won’t be victims of chaos—but of unchecked confidence.”
Not a warning against AI—but a demand for wisdom to go with it.
Because when machines take over the trades, someone must still own the consequences.